The National Times - France's Sarkozy on trial over alleged Kadhafi financing pact

France's Sarkozy on trial over alleged Kadhafi financing pact


France's Sarkozy on trial over alleged Kadhafi financing pact
France's Sarkozy on trial over alleged Kadhafi financing pact / Photo: © AFP

Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy went on trial Monday charged with accepting illegal campaign financing in an alleged pact with the late Libyan dictator Moamer Kadhafi.

Change text size:

Sarkozy's career has been shadowed by legal troubles since he lost the 2012 presidential election. He has been convicted in two other cases and is being investigated in two more but he remains an influential figure and is also known to regularly meet President Emmanuel Macron.

The new trial started barely half a month after France's top appeals court in December rejected his appeal against a one-year prison sentence for influence peddling, which he is to serve by wearing an electronic tag rather than in jail.

Sarkozy was present in the Paris court when the latest trial began but made no comment.

Twelve suspects are standing trial, including former close aides, accused of devising a pact with Kadhafi to illegally fund Sarkozy's victorious 2007 election bid. They deny the charges.

If convicted, Sarkozy, 69, faces up to 10 years in prison for harges of concealing embezzlement of public funds and illegal campaign financing.

The trial is due to last until April 10.

Sarkozy "is awaiting these four months of hearings with determination. He will fight the artificial construction dreamed up by the prosecution," said his lawyer Christophe Ingrain. "There was no Libyan financing."

Sarkozy is still not wearing the electronic tag -- a process which could take several weeks -- and spent Christmas in the Seychelles with his wife, model and singer Carla Bruni, and their daughter.

- Alleged pact with Kadhafi -

The current case follows a decade of investigations, it is alleged that Sarkozy and senior figures pledged to help Kadhafi rehabilitate his international image in return for campaign financing.

Tripoli had been blamed by the West for bombing Pan Am Flight 103 in 1988 over Lockerbie in Scotland and UTA Flight 772 over Niger in 1989 that killed hundreds of passengers.

Another alleged beneficiary was Kadhafi's brother-in-law and intelligence chief Abdullah Senussi who was jailed for life in absentia by France for the attack on UTA Flight 772. He is also wanted for questioning over the Lockerbie bombing.

Sarkozy has denounced the accusations as part of a conspiracy, insisting he never received any financing from Kadhafi.

"Our work is not political work, we are not politically engaged," declared financial prosecutor Jean-Francois Bohnert of the National Financial Prosecutor's Office (PNF) which is leading the case. "We only have one compass, it is the law."

Others on trial include Sarkozy's former right-hand man, Claude Gueant, his then-head of campaign financing, Eric Woerth, and former minister Brice Hortefeux.

The prosecution case is based on statements from seven former Libyan dignitaries, trips to Libya by Gueant and Hortefeux, transfers as well as the notebooks of the former Libyan oil minister Shukri Ghanem, found drowned in the Danube in 2012.

- Witness tampering charges -

At a time when many Western countries were courting the maverick dictator for energy deals, Kadhafi in December 2007 visited Paris, famously installing his tent in the centre of the city.

But France backed the UN-sanctioned military action that helped in 2011 oust the Libyan leader, who was then killed by rebels.

Sarkozy has said allegations from former members of Kadhafi's inner circle over the alleged financing are motivated by revenge.

The scandal erupted in April 2012, while Sarkozy was seeking re-election. The Mediapart website published a bombshell article based on a December 2006 document it said showed a former Libyan official evoking an agreement over the campaign financing.

Sarkozy has long contended that the document is not genuine.

An embittered Sarkozy narrowly lost the election to Socialist Francois Hollande.

Franco-Lebanese businessman Ziad Takieddine, a key figure in the case and a fugitive in Lebanon, claimed several times that he helped deliver up to five million euros in cash from Kadhafi in 2006 and 2007.

But in 2020, Takieddine retracted his statement, raising suspicions that Sarkozy and close allies may have paid the witness to change his mind.

In a further twist, Sarkozy was charged in October 2023 with illegal witness tampering while his wife Bruni was last year charged with hiding evidence in the same case.

Q.Marshall--TNT

Featured

Anonymous Staff Letters Emerge at Surrey City Hall Amid Executive Absences

A series of anonymous emails purportedly from Surrey city employees has surfaced, criticizing the new municipal leadership. The correspondence arrives as top officials, including the city manager and solicitor, remain absent from public view amid reports of staff reductions.

Bessent Blames Commerce Dept for Failing to Blacklist Nvidia Partner Megaspeed

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Friday that four government agencies had advocated for placing Singapore-based chip distributor Megaspeed on a trade blacklist for months, but the Commerce Department failed to do so. The comments intensify scrutiny of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick amid allegations that his administration stalled export controls on Nvidia chips destined for China.

Miss Universe Visa Controversy: Zambia and Congo Winners Denied Entry

The winners of the Miss Universe pageant representing Zambia and the Republic of the Congo have been unable to obtain visas to enter the United States. This development underscores the impact of sweeping travel restrictions imposed by the US government during Donald Trump's second administration, which have affected dozens of countries, particularly those in Africa.

Malta Court Rejects Libel Claims by Developer Kurt Buhagiar Against MEP Peter Agius

A Maltese court has rejected a libel lawsuit filed by property developer Kurt Buhagiar against Member of the European Parliament Peter Agius. The presiding judge ruled that Buhagiar could not prove how Agius’s comments regarding potential misuse of EU funds damaged his reputation, marking a shift in judicial approach to defamation cases involving public figures.

Change text size: