The National Times - Republican speaker, Trump face test in Congress leadership fight

Republican speaker, Trump face test in Congress leadership fight


Republican speaker, Trump face test in Congress leadership fight
Republican speaker, Trump face test in Congress leadership fight / Photo: © AFP/File

Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson -- and incoming US president Donald Trump -- faced a test of political strength Friday as the party's hard right threatens to try to choose a new leader.

Change text size:

Less than three weeks before Trump takes office, Republicans risk descending into internal squabbles over whether Johnson should retain the powerful position.

With Republicans holding only an ultra-thin majority over Democrats in the lower chamber of Congress, he has little margin for error.

Trump threw his full weight behind Johnson early Friday with a social media post wishing him "Good luck" and "very close to having 100% support."

"A BIG AFFIRMATION, INDEED. MAGA!" Trump declared, referencing his "Make America Great Again" slogan.

But Johnson's reelection as speaker is not a done deal.

Hardliners have turned on Johnson, depicting him as overly consensual and soft on their demands for radical government spending cuts.

Having seized the gavel in another bout of internal party turbulence in 2023, the Louisiana conservative needs virtually unanimous support in Friday's vote.

There will be intrigue until the last ballot is cast, with the 52-year-old attorney's ambitions up in flames if more than one member of the 219-215 Republican majority defects, assuming all members are present and voting.

It took 15 rounds of voting over four days to elect Kevin McCarthy to the speaker's podium at the start of the last Congress. He was ousted and replaced by Johnson 10 months later in a rebellion that paralyzed the House of Representatives for weeks.

If there is no speaker by Monday, Congress will not be able to certify Trump's election victory and the Republican -- who only gets one more term, having served in the White House from 2017-21 -- will face delays in implementing his agenda.

The hard right forms the core of Trump's political base, but the incoming president is testing that loyalty by sticking with Johnson.

At least a dozen lawmakers on the Republican right have chafed at Johnson's handling of major spending bills and are opposing him or withholding support, with one already saying he is a firm "no."

Eleven Republicans voted to oust Johnson in May after he angered the hard-right wing by bringing a massive Ukraine aid package to the floor.

- 'Least objectionable' -

"We're in constant conversation about all this. I think that those members, and all of them, want to be a part of these solutions," Johnson told Fox News on Monday.

"They made big promises to their constituents in this campaign cycle, and we've got to deliver upon them."

All 215 Democrats are expected to vote for their own leader, Hakeem Jeffries, as they did when Johnson first won the gavel.

If Johnson falls short, the process continues to a second ballot, probably also on Friday.

Failure in subsequent rounds would open the path for a potential rearguard action from anti-Johnson conservatives, and cloak-and-dagger talks between the two parties that could see the emergence of a consensus Republican backed by Democrats.

But no credible Republican alternative to Johnson has been floated publicly.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan have previously shown interest in the job, but all failed to win the gavel in 2023 when Johnson prevailed.

The speaker has been working the phones over the holiday, although it is not clear how he could appease his detractors, and congressional media outlet Punchbowl News quoted aides who said Johnson was not interested in "backroom deals."

The more he is seen as giving away the store to critics on the right, the more likely he is to alienate moderates, upping the potential for strife between Senate and House Republicans, where there is already little love lost.

"He was only electable the first time because he hadn't held any type of leadership position, nor had he ever fought for anything, so no one disliked him and everyone was tired of voting," Kentucky conservative Thomas Massie, the only declared "no" vote, posted on X.

"He won by being the least objectionable candidate, and he no longer possesses that title."

D.Kelly--TNT

Featured

Anonymous Staff Letters Emerge at Surrey City Hall Amid Executive Absences

A series of anonymous emails purportedly from Surrey city employees has surfaced, criticizing the new municipal leadership. The correspondence arrives as top officials, including the city manager and solicitor, remain absent from public view amid reports of staff reductions.

Bessent Blames Commerce Dept for Failing to Blacklist Nvidia Partner Megaspeed

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Friday that four government agencies had advocated for placing Singapore-based chip distributor Megaspeed on a trade blacklist for months, but the Commerce Department failed to do so. The comments intensify scrutiny of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick amid allegations that his administration stalled export controls on Nvidia chips destined for China.

Miss Universe Visa Controversy: Zambia and Congo Winners Denied Entry

The winners of the Miss Universe pageant representing Zambia and the Republic of the Congo have been unable to obtain visas to enter the United States. This development underscores the impact of sweeping travel restrictions imposed by the US government during Donald Trump's second administration, which have affected dozens of countries, particularly those in Africa.

Malta Court Rejects Libel Claims by Developer Kurt Buhagiar Against MEP Peter Agius

A Maltese court has rejected a libel lawsuit filed by property developer Kurt Buhagiar against Member of the European Parliament Peter Agius. The presiding judge ruled that Buhagiar could not prove how Agius’s comments regarding potential misuse of EU funds damaged his reputation, marking a shift in judicial approach to defamation cases involving public figures.

Change text size: