The National Times - South Korea's impeached president resists arrest over martial law bid

South Korea's impeached president resists arrest over martial law bid


South Korea's impeached president resists arrest over martial law bid
South Korea's impeached president resists arrest over martial law bid / Photo: © AFP

Impeached South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol remained defiantly inside his residence resisting arrest for a third day on Thursday after vowing to "fight" authorities seeking to question him over his failed martial law bid.

Change text size:

The embattled leader issued the bungled declaration on December 3 that led to his impeachment and has left him facing arrest, imprisonment or, at worst, the death penalty.

Supporters and opponents of Yoon have since camped outside his presidential residence, while members of his security team have blocked attempted police raids in a dramatic stand-off.

Yoon has gone to ground but remained unrepentant as the crisis has rolled on, issuing a defiant message to his base days before an arrest warrant expires on January 6.

"The Republic of Korea is currently in danger due to internal and external forces threatening its sovereignty, and the activities of anti-state elements," he said in a statement passed around to protesters, his lawyer Yoon Kab-keun confirmed to AFP.

"I vow to fight alongside you to the very end to protect this nation," he added, saying he watched the hundreds-strong protest on Wednesday evening on a YouTube live stream.

Yoon Kab-keun confirmed to AFP that the impeached leader remained inside the presidential compound.

"The president is at the (official presidential) residence," he said.

Opposition lawmakers were quick to condemn Yoon Suk Yeol's defiant message as inflammatory, with Democratic Party spokesperson Jo Seoung-lae calling him "delusional" and accusing him of trying to incite clashes.

The suspended president's legal team has filed for an injunction to block the warrant and described the arrest order on Wednesday as "an unlawful and invalid act".

- Blocked raids -

Corruption Investigation Office (CIO) chief Oh Dong-woon warned that anyone trying to block authorities from arresting Yoon Suk Yeol could themselves face prosecution.

Along with the summons, a Seoul court issued a search warrant for his official residence and other locations, a CIO official told AFP.

The presidential security service's official stance has been to treat the warrants with due process.

It remains unclear how many guards are stationed with him but they have blocked searches of his office and residence.

They have cited two articles in South Korea's Criminal Procedure Act that prohibit seizure from locations where official secrets are stored, without consent of the person in charge.

South Korean officials have previously failed to execute similar arrest warrants for lawmakers -- in 2000 and 2004 -- due to party members and supporters blocking police for the seven-day period the warrants were valid.

However, discussions between prosecutors and police about Yoon Suk Yeol's arrest are taking place in the background of the political crisis that saw the country briefly lurch back to the dark days of military rule.

- Refused questioning -

The martial law order, which Yoon Suk Yeol said was aimed at eliminating "anti-state elements", only lasted a few hours.

Armed troops stormed the national assembly building, scaling fences, smashing windows and landing by helicopter, but the president was quickly forced to make a U-turn after lawmakers rushed to parliament to vote it down.

He was then stripped of his presidential duties by parliament and now faces criminal charges of insurrection.

Yoon Suk Yeol has since refused summonses for questioning three times and doubled down on claims the opposition was in league with South Korea's communist enemies.

Supporters have raced to Seoul to support him in the wake of his refusal, spewing vitriol at police and waving anti-impeachment placards.

A constitutional court will rule whether to uphold his impeachment.

The turmoil deepened late last week when his replacement, Han Duck-soo, was also impeached by parliament for failing to sign bills for investigations into his predecessor.

Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok has been installed as acting president and pledged to do all he can to end the political upheaval.

He has since decided to appoint two new judges to the constitutional court, a key demand of the opposition, but was criticised by Yoon Suk Yeol's staff as overstepping his powers.

T.Cunningham--TNT

Featured

Anonymous Staff Letters Emerge at Surrey City Hall Amid Executive Absences

A series of anonymous emails purportedly from Surrey city employees has surfaced, criticizing the new municipal leadership. The correspondence arrives as top officials, including the city manager and solicitor, remain absent from public view amid reports of staff reductions.

Bessent Blames Commerce Dept for Failing to Blacklist Nvidia Partner Megaspeed

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Friday that four government agencies had advocated for placing Singapore-based chip distributor Megaspeed on a trade blacklist for months, but the Commerce Department failed to do so. The comments intensify scrutiny of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick amid allegations that his administration stalled export controls on Nvidia chips destined for China.

Miss Universe Visa Controversy: Zambia and Congo Winners Denied Entry

The winners of the Miss Universe pageant representing Zambia and the Republic of the Congo have been unable to obtain visas to enter the United States. This development underscores the impact of sweeping travel restrictions imposed by the US government during Donald Trump's second administration, which have affected dozens of countries, particularly those in Africa.

Malta Court Rejects Libel Claims by Developer Kurt Buhagiar Against MEP Peter Agius

A Maltese court has rejected a libel lawsuit filed by property developer Kurt Buhagiar against Member of the European Parliament Peter Agius. The presiding judge ruled that Buhagiar could not prove how Agius’s comments regarding potential misuse of EU funds damaged his reputation, marking a shift in judicial approach to defamation cases involving public figures.

Change text size: