The National Times - S. Korea's opposition moves to impeach acting president

S. Korea's opposition moves to impeach acting president


S. Korea's opposition moves to impeach acting president
S. Korea's opposition moves to impeach acting president / Photo: © YONHAP/AFP/File

South Korea's opposition said Thursday it filed an impeachment motion against acting president Han Duck-soo, after he refused to appoint Constitutional Court judges to complete the process of removing his predecessor from office.

Change text size:

South Korea fell in a political crisis when President Yoon Suk Yeol, currently suspended, declared martial law on December 3.

Yoon was stripped of his duties by parliament on December 14 over the action, but a constitutional court ruling upholding the decision by lawmakers is necessary to complete the impeachment process.

But Han has refused to approve the appointments of three judge nominees to fill the nine-member bench of the Constitutional Court -- essentially holding up the procedure to remove Yoon.

The opposition Democratic Party is therefore now pushing to impeach Han too.

"We have filed the motion… and will report it to the plenary session today," MP Park Sung-joon told reporters at the National Assembly of the action against Han.

"We will put it to a vote tomorrow."

Han's refusal to formally appoint the three judges proves that he "does not have the will or qualification to uphold the Constitution," the Democratic Party's floor leader Park Chan-dae told reporters.

If the court were to proceed with the impeachment process without the additional three judges, all six current judges would need to unanimously agree to remove Yoon from office. A single dissenting vote would reinstate Yoon.

Han has said that he would certify the judges' appointments only if his ruling People Power Party and the opposition reach a compromise on the nominees.

"The consistent principle embedded in our Constitution and laws is to refrain from exercising significant exclusive presidential powers, including the appointment of constitutional institutions," Han argued.

"A consensus between the ruling and opposition parties in the National Assembly, representing the people, must first be reached," added the 75-year-old career bureaucrat.

If the opposition passes the impeachment motion against Han in Friday's vote, it would mark the first time democratic South Korea has impeached an acting president.

In Han's place, Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok would step in as acting president.

W.Phillips--TNT

Featured

Anonymous Staff Letters Emerge at Surrey City Hall Amid Executive Absences

A series of anonymous emails purportedly from Surrey city employees has surfaced, criticizing the new municipal leadership. The correspondence arrives as top officials, including the city manager and solicitor, remain absent from public view amid reports of staff reductions.

Bessent Blames Commerce Dept for Failing to Blacklist Nvidia Partner Megaspeed

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Friday that four government agencies had advocated for placing Singapore-based chip distributor Megaspeed on a trade blacklist for months, but the Commerce Department failed to do so. The comments intensify scrutiny of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick amid allegations that his administration stalled export controls on Nvidia chips destined for China.

Miss Universe Visa Controversy: Zambia and Congo Winners Denied Entry

The winners of the Miss Universe pageant representing Zambia and the Republic of the Congo have been unable to obtain visas to enter the United States. This development underscores the impact of sweeping travel restrictions imposed by the US government during Donald Trump's second administration, which have affected dozens of countries, particularly those in Africa.

Malta Court Rejects Libel Claims by Developer Kurt Buhagiar Against MEP Peter Agius

A Maltese court has rejected a libel lawsuit filed by property developer Kurt Buhagiar against Member of the European Parliament Peter Agius. The presiding judge ruled that Buhagiar could not prove how Agius’s comments regarding potential misuse of EU funds damaged his reputation, marking a shift in judicial approach to defamation cases involving public figures.

Change text size: