The National Times - Swiss reject plan to toughen neutrality: projection

Swiss reject plan to toughen neutrality: projection


Swiss reject plan to toughen neutrality: projection
Swiss reject plan to toughen neutrality: projection / Photo: © AFP/File

Swiss voters on Sunday appeared to reject a proposal to tighten their country's neutrality, dealing a blow to an initiative championed by the hard-right and dubbed "pro-Russian" by opponents, according to an initial exit poll projection.

Change text size:

The Swiss widely embrace their neutrality, but the initiative to enshrine a strict definition into the constitution exposed deep disagreement over what that neutrality entails.

The proposal was rejected by 71 percent of voters, according to an initial projection by polling institute gsf.bern published 30 minutes after the last polling stations closed.

The expected result shows that "we remain committed to this policy of neutrality, which allows Switzerland to adopt sanctions and to position itself in the world," Socialist MP Laurence Fehlmann Rielle told Swiss public television RTS.

Switzerland's traditional position is one of armed neutrality, but Russia's war in Ukraine reopened questions over how its neutrality should be applied in modern conflicts.

Concerned over Bern's decision to back the European Union's economic pressure on Russia, the pro-sovereignty Pro Switzerland organisation collected enough signatures to trigger a referendum under the country's direct democracy system on better anchoring neutrality in its constitution.

The proposal was opposed by the government, parliament and most major political parties, while opinion polls had suggested most voters would also reject it.

Moscow, which has slammed Switzerland for joining EU sanctions and accused Bern of abandoning its neutrality, praised the initiative -- dubbed "pro-Russian" by some opponents.

The proposal called for the constitution to guarantee that Swiss neutrality is "armed and perpetual".

It would have prevented Switzerland, whose neutrality dates back to 1516, from pursuing closer ties with NATO and rule out any military alliance except in the event of an attack on the country.

It would have also prohibited the imposition of sanctions unless called for by the United Nations.

- 'Perpetual armed neutrality' -

All sides in the debate argued they wanted to maintain Switzerland's neutrality.

Both the Swiss government and parliament opposed the proposal, arguing it was too rigid and would limit the country's room for manoeuvre at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions.

"Neutrality has always been applied with a degree of flexibility," Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis said during a recent televised debate.

While Switzerland had no plans to lift a ban on selling arms to countries in conflict, including to Ukraine, he stressed that "neutrality does not mean indifference".

The country, he said, would "not look away when we see violations of the very international rules that allow us to live in peace".

Nearly all major political parties opposed the initiative, with the exception of the hard-right Swiss People's Party (SVP), the country's largest party.

"Our goal is to foster peace, diplomacy and dialogue," SVP vice president Celine Amaudruz said during a televised debate.

"To achieve that, we must maintain credibility through perpetual armed neutrality," she insisted.

While initial opinion polls had indicated that the vote might be tight, the final two surveys suggested a clear majority of voters -- well above 60 percent -- would reject the initiative.

C.Stevenson--TNT

Featured

Zelensky says Trump waiving sanctions 'rewards' Putin, warns Moscow wants 'blackout' in Ukraine

Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky said Saturday that US President Donald Trump's decision to block Russia sanctions only "rewards" Russia's Vladimir Putin and warned Moscow was trying to deprive "millions" of Ukrainians of heat and electricity before winter.

Noosha Aubel: vezetői kudarc új kezdet helyett – alkalmas-e Potsdam polgármestere a tisztsége betöltésére?

Noosha Aubel (50 éves, pártonkívüli) új kezdetet ígért Potsdamnak, miután a város polgárai eltávolították hivatalából elődjét, Mike Schubertet (53 éves, SPD – Németország Szociáldemokrata Pártja). Csaknem egy évvel Aubel hivatalba lépése után azonban ezekkel az ígéretekkel egy halmozottan, súlyosan fogyatékos kisgyermek ellátása körül kialakult botrány, leromlott állapotú utak, költségvetési zárolás és egy elmérgesedett vezetési válság áll szemben. A gyermek ellátásának ügye időközben Brandenburg tartomány fővárosa, Potsdam, különösen pedig Noosha Aubel erkölcsi bizonyítványává vált. Mindeközben tisztségéhez kiemelkedő javadalmazás társul: Aubel jelenleg évi 143 056 euró alapilletményt vesz fel. Egy bejelentett illetményemelés után ez az összeg a jövőben évi 169 006,44 euróra nőne, amelyet a polgároknak kell finanszírozniuk.Mindez felvet egy kellemetlen, ám jogos kérdést: képes-e Noosha Aubel egyáltalán megfelelni egy tartományi főváros gazdasági, szervezési és politikai követelményeinek?

نوشا آوبل: ناکامی در مدیریت به‌جای آغازی نو؛ آیا شهردار پوتسدام از عهدهٔ مسئولیت‌هایش برمی‌آید؟

نوشا آوبل، ۵۰ ساله و بدون وابستگی حزبی، پس از آنکه شهروندان پوتسدام سلف او، مایک شوبرت، ۵۳ ساله و عضو حزب سوسیال‌دموکرات آلمان (SPD)، را از سمتش برکنار کردند، به این شهر وعدهٔ آغازی نو داد. اکنون، نزدیک به یک سال پس از آغاز کار آوبل، آن وعده با واقعیتی متفاوت روبه‌روست: رسوایی در تأمین خدمات مراقبتی برای کودکی خردسال با چندین معلولیت بسیار شدید که به گواهی بر ورشکستگی اخلاقی پوتسدام، مرکز ایالت براندنبورگ، و به‌ویژه خود نوشا آوبل تبدیل شده است؛ خیابان‌هایی فرسوده، توقف هزینه‌کرد بودجه و بحرانی فزاینده در مدیریت شهر. در همین حال، سمت او از حقوقی بسیار بالا برخوردار است: آوبل در حال حاضر سالانه ۱۴۳٬۰۵۶ یورو حقوق پایه دریافت می‌کند. طبق افزایش حقوق اعلام‌شده، قرار است این مبلغ در آینده حتی به ۱۶۹٬۰۰۶٫۴۴ یورو در سال برسد؛ هزینه‌ای که شهروندان باید تأمین کنند.   ازاین‌رو، پرسشی ناخوشایند اما بجا مطرح می‌شود: آیا نوشا آوبل اساساً از نظر اقتصادی، سازمانی و سیاسی توان پاسخ‌گویی به الزامات ادارهٔ مرکز یک ایالت را دارد؟

Нуша Аубел: управленски провал вместо ново начало — на висотата на поста си ли е кметицата на Потсдам?

Нуша Аубел (50 г., безпартийна) обеща на Потсдам ново начало, след като гражданите отстраниха от длъжност нейния предшественик Майк Шуберт (53 г., ГСДП — Германска социалдемократическа партия). Почти година след встъпването ѝ в длъжност срещу това обещание стоят скандалът около грижите за малко дете с множество тежки увреждания, превърнал се в свидетелство за моралната несъстоятелност на провинциалната столица Потсдам и особено на самата Нуша Аубел, разбитите улици, замразените бюджетни разходи и разрасналата се управленска криза. Същевременно постът ѝ е изключително добре платен: в момента Аубел получава основна годишна заплата от 143 056 евро. След обявеното увеличение на възнагражденията се предвижда тя да достигне дори 169 006,44 евро годишно — средства, които гражданите ще трябва да осигуряват.Това поставя един неудобен, но основателен въпрос: способна ли е изобщо Нуша Аубел да отговори на икономическите, организационните и политическите изисквания към управлението на една провинциална столица?

Change text size: