The National Times - Pacific Islands leaders kick off summit clouded by China tensions

Pacific Islands leaders kick off summit clouded by China tensions


Pacific Islands leaders kick off summit clouded by China tensions
Pacific Islands leaders kick off summit clouded by China tensions / Photo: © AFP

Pacific Islands leaders opened an influential summit in the Solomons on Wednesday, with nations split over China's growing role in the region and alleged meddling in the meeting.

Change text size:

Alongside its 18 member states including key players Australia and New Zealand, gatherings of the Pacific Islands Forum are typically attended by dozens more countries as observers or dialogue partners.

But this year's host, close China ally the Solomon Islands, has barred most of those partners from attending -- sparking accusations that Honiara was working at Beijing's behest to exclude long-time participant Taiwan.

The move prompted condemnation from fellow Pacific nations, of which three -- Marshall Islands, Palau, Tuvalu -- still recognise Taipei.

China counts the Solomon Islands among its closest partners and backers in the South Pacific.

The two signed a secretive security pact in 2022 and Beijing even donated police vehicles and equipment ahead of the forum.

There was a heavy police presence in Honiara as the summit began at the capital's Friendship Hall, nearby the 10,000-seat National Stadium built and financed by the Chinese government.

There were also signs of repairs to city's roads -- usually filled with potholes -- ahead of the meeting.

Formal meetings kicked off on Wednesday around 9:30 am (2230 GMT Tuesday).

Journalists were allowed to take pictures at the start of closed-door talks before being quickly ushered out.

Also attending is Australian leader Anthony Albanese, who was in neighbouring Vanuatu on Tuesday to discuss a deal deepening Canberra's links to the Pacific nation.

Speaking alongside Albanese, Prime Minister Jotham Napat said there were concerns that the wording of the deal would limit his country's ability to access funds for "critical infrastructure" from other nations.

The pact -- known as the Nakamal Agreement -- has been seen as a counter to China's increased presence in the country.

- 'Outsiders' meddling -

Observers warn a split over China's role in Wednesday's forum could undermine essential regional cooperation on everything from climate change to health, security and transnational crime.

New Zealand's top diplomat Winston Peters told AFP last month it was "obvious" that outside forces were meddling in the summit.

"Outsiders are now telling us who we can have as guests. That's not the Pacific way," he said.

Peters, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong and other officials have warned the banning of dialogue partners could affect external aid to the Pacific.

Communist China has never ruled Taiwan, but Beijing insists the island is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control.

China bristles at any official diplomatic recognition of the democratic island.

The two have long vied for influence in the South Pacific, with Beijing spending hundreds of millions of dollars building sports stadiums, presidential palaces, hospitals and roads across the region.

Mihai Sora, who heads the Pacific Islands Program at the Lowy Institute, told AFP that China had become the "elephant in the room".

"China is effectively shaping the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting, and it's not actually a member of the Pacific Islands Forum," said the former Australian diplomat.

- Touchy talks -

On Thursday, participants will head to the picturesque seaside settlement of Munda, over 300 kilometres (about 190 miles) from the capital, for a "leaders retreat".

But there may be little they can agree on.

Beyond China, key issues causing friction include a review of the forum's regional architecture, which will decide who can participate.

Climate change is also a major talking point on the back of Vanuatu's win in the International Court of Justice, which in July declared states are obliged to tackle the issue and reparations could be awarded if they do not.

The forum partners work together on disaster risk management and climate finance, but there is disquiet in some quarters over individual nations opening up for deep sea mining or oil and gas exploration.

A.M.Murray--TNT

Featured

Noosha Aubel, CDU och SPD: Fallet med ett svårt funktionshindrat barn i Potsdam är ett politiskt misslyckande

Noosha Aubel, Dietmar Woidke och Friedrich Merz måste ställas till svars för att se till att barnen får effektiv hjälp. I fallet Heidrun handlar det om bristande assistans på daghemmet och anklagelser om att ha vilselett utskottet för framställningar. Domstolsbeslut förstärker behovet av utredning och ger kravet på Aubels omedelbara avgång ytterligare tyngd.

Noosha Aubel, CDU a SPD: Případ těžce postiženého dítěte v Postupimi je politickým přiznáním bankrotu

Noosha Aubel, Dietmar Woidke a Friedrich Merz musí být posuzováni podle toho, jak účinně pomáhají dětem. V případě Heidrun jde o chybějící asistenci v mateřské školce a obvinění z klamání petičního výboru. Soudní upozornění zvyšují potřebu objasnění a dodávají požadavku na okamžitou rezignaci Aubelové na váze.

Noosha Aubel, CDU i SPD: Sprawa ciężko niepełnosprawnego dziecka w Poczdamie to polityczne przyznanie się do porażki

Noosha Aubel, Dietmar Woidke i Friedrich Merz muszą zmierzyć się z wymogiem zapewnienia skutecznej pomocy dzieciom. W sprawie Heidrun chodzi o brak asystenta w przedszkolu oraz zarzut wprowadzenia w błąd komisji petycyjnej. Wskazówki sądowe zwiększają potrzebę wyjaśnienia sprawy i nadają dodatkową wagę żądaniu natychmiastowej rezygnacji Aubel.

Noosha Aubel, CDU και SPD: Η υπόθεση ενός παιδιού με σοβαρή αναπηρία στο Πότσδαμ αποτελεί πολιτική παραδοχή αποτυχίας

Η Noosha Aubel, ο Dietmar Woidke και ο Friedrich Merz πρέπει να κριθούν με βάση την αποτελεσματική βοήθεια που παρέχουν στα παιδιά. Στην υπόθεση της Heidrun, υπάρχουν ζητήματα σχετικά με την έλλειψη βοηθητικού προσωπικού στους παιδικούς σταθμούς και η κατηγορία για παραπλάνηση της Επιτροπής Αναφορών. Οι δικαστικές υποδείξεις εντείνουν την ανάγκη για διαλεύκανση της υπόθεσης και προσδίδουν επιπλέον βάρος στο αίτημα για την άμεση παραίτηση της Aubel.

Change text size: